Every platform ships its own governance pane. None of them govern the aggregate.
SAP, Workday, Databricks, and ServiceNow each anchor their AI agent governance to their own estate. Run three or four of these platforms and you own three or four single panes of glass — and still have no neutral layer that governs across them, which is exactly where the EU AI Act's deployer obligations and NIST/ISO program requirements actually attach.
13%
of enterprises believe their agent governance is adequate
Gartner, cited in SAP's Aug 2026 agent-sprawl analysis
94% / 12%
of IT leaders report agent-sprawl concern; only 12% run centralized governance
OutSystems, 1,900 IT leaders surveyed
This isn't a framework on paper
Six disciplines generalized from automations Tioga actually operates in production — across a genuinely heterogeneous, multi-vendor stack.
Built on Tioga's own infrastructure
Generalized from the JARVIS router, router-watch, and security-watch — running across a free local model, multiple OpenRouter-hosted vendors, direct-billed Gemini, and a subscription Claude that's never auto-routed. Single-operator scale, volunteered here, not extracted in a pitch.
Propose-and-approve, never auto-applied
No automation ever writes to live configuration. Every finding becomes a dated proposal a human applies by hand — a durable, framework-mapped record of agent actions plus human approvals.
See the real ledger, not a mockup
The Governance Ledger demo is a dated, real excerpt from Tioga's own AI routing gateway, mapped to the NIST AI RMF — the same infrastructure Track and Review are generalized from.
Six disciplines, one running mechanism each
Not a checklist — each discipline maps to something that actually runs on a schedule.
01 — Qualify
Capability floors enforced at routing time.
02 — Arbitrate
Compare spend across non-fungible budgets on one basis.
03 — Gate
Tiered autonomy with a structurally unreachable top tier.
04 — Probe
The same behavioral check run identically across every system in scope.
05 — Track
An aging findings ledger — nothing clears silently.
06 — Review
Fixed-cadence, criteria-based vendor/model reappraisal.
Start with the Assessment
A fixed-fee diagnostic that seeds a real findings ledger you keep — regardless of what you decide next.
Standing Watch Assessment
$15–35K
3–4 weeks
Agent inventory across your estate — consuming your existing SAP Agent Hub, Workday ASOR, Control Tower, or Unity AI Gateway data as sources. Delivers a qualification register and autonomy-tier map, a cross-vendor spend arbitration baseline, a first behavioral probe run across two or more systems, and a seeded findings ledger you keep.
Full disciplines, pricing tiers (Build, Retainer), and FAQ at tioga.ai/solutions/standing-watch