AI governance that's built into the architecture, not backfilled after a pilot succeeds
Most AI governance work happens after a pilot already succeeded and someone in legal asks whether it's compliant. By then the architecture doesn't have oversight controls, evidence logging, or human-review gates built in — those get bolted on, badly.
Who this is for
CCOs, CAIOs, and compliance leaders who need a real AI governance program — NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, EU AI Act, or US state law — not a policy document that doesn't match what's actually running in production.
What you get
A governance program — gap analysis and a remediation roadmap, and, if you're building with Tioga, an architecture with oversight, evidence, and an audit trail built in from the first line of code.
Why this is real, not a pitch deck
The deepest bench of the three practices
Eight distinct governance engagements exist because this is the actual center of Tioga's business — not a checkbox practice bolted onto an automation shop.
Built on the same infrastructure Tioga runs itself
The live Governance Ledger demo uses real routing data from Tioga's own AI operations, mapped to NIST AI RMF — not a hypothetical example.
Framework-mapped, not framework-namedropped
See the NIST / ISO 42001 / EU AI Act framework-mapping page — a real conceptual alignment across all three, not three logos next to each other.
Operator experience with audit-readiness
Before founding Tioga AI, Sukir managed the governance work that keeps ERP, HR, and CRM systems audit-ready across four sister companies — not just AI-specific compliance theory.
Engagements
Every engagement starts with a 5-day Discovery Sprint ($5,000 flat, prototype included) that scopes the work before any larger commitment — credited toward the price below if you move forward.
AI Governance Readiness Assessment
NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, EU AI Act, and US state law gap analysis with a prioritized remediation roadmap and sample executive summary.
$20–35K
3–4 weeks
Agentic AI Governance Framework
Governance architecture for organizations deploying autonomous AI agents in production — risk registers, oversight controls, and escalation protocols.
$30–75K
4–8 weeks
ISO 42001 Implementation Sprint
Structured implementation of an AI management system aligned to ISO 42001, from readiness assessment to certification-ready documentation.
$50–120K
3–6 months
EU AI Act Conformity Program
Full conformity documentation, technical files, and governance controls for organizations subject to the EU AI Act, structured for audit readiness.
$75–200K
4–8 months
Questions
Which framework should we align to — NIST, ISO 42001, or the EU AI Act?+
Depends on your regulatory exposure and buyer requirements — the Readiness Assessment includes a framework-fit recommendation, not just a generic checklist against all three.
Do we need to be ISO 42001 certified?+
Not necessarily — certification is one path. The framework-mapping page shows how NIST, ISO 42001, and the EU AI Act line up conceptually, so you can see what applies before committing to certification specifically.
Is this governance-as-consulting, or does it touch our actual AI systems?+
Both, depending on the engagement — some, like the Readiness Assessment, are gap-analysis and roadmap; others, like the Agentic AI Governance Framework, build oversight controls into a system you're actually running.
What if we're pre-pilot and don't have anything running yet?+
That's the ideal time to start — governance built into the architecture from day one is materially cheaper than retrofitting it after a pilot succeeds.